| | 741: | | Title: | | | | | Volume/Number: | 2015 | | | | Issuing Agency: | | | | | Description: | Chicago Joint Board, Local 200, RWDSU and United Food and Commercial Workers International Union -vs- County of Cook(John H. Stroger Hospital): On April 16, 2015, Administrative Law Judge Anna Hamburg-Gal issued a Recommended Decision and Order in the above-captioned case finding that the petitioned-for Pharmacy Supervisor IVs employed at the County of Cook, Health and Hospital System (Employer) are supervisory employees as defined by Section 3(r) of the Illinos Public Labor Relations Act, 5 ILCS 315 (2014), as amended and ordering that the petition for representation filed by the Chicago Joint Board, Local 200, RWDSU, United Food and Commercial Workers International Union be dismissed. Therefore, in accordance with Section 1200.135 of the Rules and Regulations of the Illinois Labor Relations Board, 80 Ill. Admin. Code, Parts 1200 through 1240, Petitioner filed timely exceptions to the Recommended Decision and Order, followed by Employer's timely responses. After reviewing the record, exceptions and responses, we hereby uphold the Recommended Decision and Order for the reasons set forth by the Administrative Law Judge. | | | | Date Created: | 09-10-2015 | | | | Agency ID: | Case No. L-RC-14-018 | | | | ISL ID: | 000000056177 Original UID: 177159 FIRST WORD: Opinions | |
| 742: | | Title: | | | | | Volume/Number: | 2015 | | | | Issuing Agency: | | | | | Description: | International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 700 and Illinois Fraternal Order of Police Labor Council -vs- County of Cook and Sheriff of Cook County: On March 9, 2015, Administrative Law Judge Deena Sanceda issued a Recommended Decision and Order in the above-captioned case finding that Respondents had violated Section 10(a)(1) of the Illinois Public Labor Relations Act, 5 ILCS 315 (2014), as amended, when they unilaterally changed their secondary employment policy. Thereafter, in accordance with Section 1200.135 of the Rules and Regulations of the Illinois Labor Relations Board, 80 Ill. Admin. Code, Parts 1200 through 1300, Charging Party and Intervening Charging Party filed timely exceptions to the Recommended Decision and Order, followed by Respondents timely responses. After reviewing the record, exceptions and responses, we hereby uphold the Recommended Decision and Order for the reasons set forth by the Administrative Law Judge. | | | | Date Created: | 09-29-2015 | | | | Agency ID: | Case No. L-CA-14-016 | | | | ISL ID: | 000000056430 Original UID: 177461 FIRST WORD: Opinions | |
| 743: | | Title: | | | | | Volume/Number: | 2015 | | | | Issuing Agency: | | | | | Description: | International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 700 and Illinois Fraternal Order of Police Labor Council -vs- County of Cook and Sheriff of Cook County: On March 6, 2015, Administrative Law Judge Kelly Coyle issued a Recommended Decision and Order finding that the County of Cook and Sheriff of Cook County violated Sections 10(a)(4) and (1) of the Illinois Public Labor Relations Act, 5 ILCS 315 (2014), as amended. The ALJ found that the Respondents violated Sections 10(a)(4) and (1) of the Act when they implemented a Gang Order without affording the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 700, notice and an opportunity to bargain. She also found that the Respondents violated Section 10(a)(1) of the Act when they implemented a Rules of Conduct Order on the grounds that the Rules of Conduct Order prohibits protected activity. | | | | Date Created: | 09-28-2015 | | | | Agency ID: | Case No. L-CA-13-055 | | | | ISL ID: | 000000056431 Original UID: 177462 FIRST WORD: Opinions | |
| 744: | | Title: | | | | | Volume/Number: | 2015 | | | | Issuing Agency: | | | | | Description: | Service Employees International Union, Local 73 -vs- County of Cook: On April 30, 2015, Administrative Law Judge Kate Vanek issued a Recommended Decision and Order dismissing a charge filed by the Service Employees International Union, Local 73 against the County of Cook alleging that the Respondent violated Sections 10(a)(4) and (1) of the Illinois Public Labor Relations Act, 5 ILCS 315 (2014), as amended, when it unilaterally imposed new licensing and educational requirements for unit employees holding the job title of classification of Mental Health Specialist II (MHS II) and Mental Health Specialist Senior (MHS Senior). The Respondent employs the MHS IIs and MHS Seniors at Cermak Hospital, which services the Cook County Jail. One of the primary functions of the MHS IIs and Seniors is to screen inmates for mental health problems when they arrive at the jail so that they may be properly housed. The Job descriptions for MHS IIs and MHS Senoirs require only a bachelor's degree and do not require licensure. | | | | Date Created: | 09-28-2015 | | | | Agency ID: | Case No. L-CA-12-062 | | | | ISL ID: | 000000056432 Original UID: 177463 FIRST WORD: Opinions | |
| 745: | | Title: | | | | | Volume/Number: | 2015 October | | | | Issuing Agency: | | | | | Description: | Opinions and orders of the Illinois Commerce Commission for October 2015. | | | | Date Created: | | | | | Agency ID: | | | | | ISL ID: | 000000056586 Original UID: FIRST WORD: Opinions | |
| 746: | | Title: | | | | | Volume/Number: | 2015 | | | | Issuing Agency: | | | | | Description: | City of Chicago, Office of Emergency Management and Communications vs Policemen's Benevolent Labor Committee: On August 7, 2015, Administrative Law Judge Kelly Coyle, on behalf of the Illinois Labor Relations Board, issued a Recommended Decision and Order in the above-captioned matter. No party filed exceptions to the Administrative Law Judge's Recommendation during the time allotted, and at its October 8, 2015 public meeting, the Board, having reviewed the matter, declined to take it up on its own motion. | | | | Date Created: | 10-08-2015 | | | | Agency ID: | Case No. L-RC-13-017 | | | | ISL ID: | 000000056679 Original UID: 177733 FIRST WORD: Opinions | |
| 747: | | Title: | | | | | Volume/Number: | 2015 | | | | Issuing Agency: | | | | | Description: | Salvatore T. Ziccarelli vs Illinois Labor Relations Board, Local Panel; International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 700: Petitioner Salvatore T. Ziccarelli, a correctional officer employed by the Sheriff of Cook County, filed a charge pursuant to section 10(b) of the Illinois Public Labor Relations Act (5 ILCS 315/10 (West 2000)) with the Illinois Labor Relations Board (ILRB or Board) contending his labor union, respondent Local No. 700 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters (labor union or union), failed to fairly represent him at an employment-related arbitration in 2012. The Board dismissed Ziccarellis charge on grounds that he did not give the Board supporting evidence. When he subsequently appealed to the board, it upheld and affirmed the dismissal. In this direct appeal pursuant to the Illinois Administrative Review Act (735 ILCS 5/3-113 (West 1990)), Ziccarelli contends the board never formally requested evidence to support his charge and that his compliance with the purported deadline would have been unreasonable or unnecessarily burdensome. The board and the labor union have responded to the merits of these arguments, but also contend these are new arguments -- ones which Ziccarelli is presenting for the first time on appeal -- which results in waiver of those arguments. Accordingly, we first consider whether the arguments are new. The record and appeal lead us to conclude that the arguments are untimely raised and have been waived. | | | | Date Created: | 10-08-2015 | | | | Agency ID: | Case No. L-CB-13-020, IL App. (1st) No. 1-14-1223 | | | | ISL ID: | 000000056680 Original UID: 177734 FIRST WORD: Opinions | |
| 748: | | Title: | | | | | Volume/Number: | 2015 November | | | | Issuing Agency: | | | | | Description: | Opinions and orders of the Illinois Commerce Commission for November 2015. | | | | Date Created: | | | | | Agency ID: | | | | | ISL ID: | 000000056840 Original UID: FIRST WORD: Opinions | |
| 749: | | Title: | | | | | Volume/Number: | 2015 December | | | | Issuing Agency: | | | | | Description: | Opinions and orders of the Illinois Commerce Commission for December 2015. | | | | Date Created: | | | | | Agency ID: | | | | | ISL ID: | 000000056885 Original UID: FIRST WORD: Opinions | |
| 750: | | Title: | | | | | Volume/Number: | 2016 | | | | Issuing Agency: | | | | | Description: | Opinions and orders of the Illinois Commerce Commission for 2016. | | | | Date Created: | | | | | Agency ID: | | | | | ISL ID: | 000000056970 Original UID: FIRST WORD: Opinions | |
| 751: | | Title: | | | | | Volume/Number: | 2016 January | | | | Issuing Agency: | | | | | Description: | Opinions and orders of the Illinois Commerce Commission for January 2016. | | | | Date Created: | | | | | Agency ID: | | | | | ISL ID: | 000000056971 Original UID: FIRST WORD: Opinions | |
| 752: | | Title: | | | | | Volume/Number: | 2016 February | | | | Issuing Agency: | | | | | Description: | Opinions and orders of the Illinois Commerce Commission for February 2016. | | | | Date Created: | | | | | Agency ID: | | | | | ISL ID: | 000000057270 Original UID: FIRST WORD: Opinions | |
| 753: | | Title: | | | | | Volume/Number: | 2016 March | | | | Issuing Agency: | | | | | Description: | Opinions and orders of the Illinois Commerce Commission for March 2016. | | | | Date Created: | | | | | Agency ID: | | | | | ISL ID: | 000000057408 Original UID: FIRST WORD: Opinions | |
| 754: | | Title: | | | | | Volume/Number: | 2016 March | | | | Issuing Agency: | | | | | Description: | Opinions and orders of the Illinois Commerce Commission for April 2016. | | | | Date Created: | | | | | Agency ID: | | | | | ISL ID: | 000000057732 Original UID: FIRST WORD: Opinions | |
| 755: | | Title: | | | | | Volume/Number: | 2016 | | | | Issuing Agency: | | | | | Description: | Opinions and Orders filed with the Illinois Local Labor Relations Board for 2016. | | | | Date Created: | | | | | Agency ID: | | | | | ISL ID: | 000000057733 Original UID: FIRST WORD: Opinions | |
| 756: | | Title: | | | | | Volume/Number: | 2016 | | | | Issuing Agency: | | | | | Description: | Virtis Jones, Jr. -vs- Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 241: On February 2, 2016, Administrative Law Judge Anna Hamburg-Gal, on behalf of the Illinois Labor Relations Board, issued a Recommended Decision and Order in the above-captioned matter. No party filed exceptions to the Administrative Law Judges Recommendation during the time allotted, and at its April 12, 2016 Public meeting, the Board, having reviewed the matter, declined to take it up on its own motion. | | | | Date Created: | 04-13-2016 | | | | Agency ID: | Case No. L-CB-13-006 | | | | ISL ID: | 000000057760 Original UID: 178851 FIRST WORD: Opinions | |
| 757: | | Title: | | | | | Volume/Number: | 2015 | | | | Issuing Agency: | | | | | Description: | Anthony Williams -vs- Chicago Transit Authority: On September 18, 2015, Administrative Law Judge Deena Sanceda, on behalf of the Illinois Labor Relations Board, issued a Recommended Decision and Order in the above-captioned matter. No party filed exceptions to the Administrative Law Judges Recommendation during the time allotted, and at its December 15, 2015 Public meeting, the Board, having reviewed the matter, declined to take it up on its own motion. | | | | Date Created: | 12-18-2015 | | | | Agency ID: | Case No. L-CA-13-059 | | | | ISL ID: | 000000057761 Original UID: 178852 FIRST WORD: Opinions | |
| 758: | | Title: | | | | | Volume/Number: | 2007 | | | | Issuing Agency: | | | | | Description: | Opinions and Orders filed with the Illinois Local Labor Relations Board. | | | | Date Created: | | | | | Agency ID: | | | | | ISL ID: | 000000057801 Original UID: FIRST WORD: Opinions | |
| 759: | | Title: | | | | | Volume/Number: | 2007 | | | | Issuing Agency: | | | | | Description: | Chicago Transit Authority -vs- Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 241: On May 15, 2003, Administrative Law Judge Philip M. Kazanjian, on behalf of the Local Panel of the Illinois Labor Relations Board (Board), issued a Recommended Decision and Order in the abovecaptionedcases, 20 PERI 80 (IL LRB-ALJ 2003), finding that the Chicago Transit Authority (CTA) violated Section 10(a)(1) of the Illinois Public Labor Relations Act (Act), 5 ILCS 315 (2004), as amended, when it threatened certain of its employees and denied the Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 241 (Union orLocal 241), access to its property to conduct an election, in retaliation for a strike authorization vote the Union conducted in June 2001. Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Kazanjian, however, dismissed the Union's allegation that the CTA violated Section 10(a)(1) of the Act when it issued a memorandum to certain of its employees, warning that if they engaged in certain job actions, it would discipline them. The ALJ also dismissed the CTA's complaint against the Union, finding no merit to its contentions that the Union violated Section 10(b)(1) and (4) of the Act when it conducted the strike authorization vote and maintained its position that the members of its bargaining unit have the right to strike. | | | | Date Created: | 04-21-2016 | | | | Agency ID: | Case No. L-CB-01-038; Case No. L-CA-02-003; Case No. L-CA-02-004 | | | | ISL ID: | 000000057802 Original UID: 178895 FIRST WORD: Opinions | |
| 760: | | Title: | | | | | Volume/Number: | 2016 March | | | | Issuing Agency: | | | | | Description: | American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Council 31 -vs- Sheriff of Cook County and Cook County: On October 14, 2015, Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Anna Hamburg-Gal issued a Recommended Decision and Order (RDO) dismissing the above-captioned case. On September 24, 2014, the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Council 31 (AFSCME or Union) filed a petition with the Illinois Labor Relations Board (Board) seeking to clarify the unit, certified by the Board in Case No. L-RC-06-099, to included the Lieutenants in the Electronic Monitoring Unit, employed by the Sheriff of Cook County and Cook County (jointly, Employer). The Employer opposed the petition, asserting that the employees sought to be represented are excluded from coverage of the Illinois Public Labor Relations Act, 5 ILCS 315 (2014), as amended (Act), pursuant to the exemption for supervisory and managerial employees. The Employer also asserted that the unit clarification petition is a procedurally improper means be which to add the Lieutenants to the unit. | | | | Date Created: | 03-10-2016 | | | | Agency ID: | Case No. L-UC-15-004 | | | | ISL ID: | 000000057815 Original UID: 178908 FIRST WORD: Opinions | |
|
