Illinois State Library

Electronic Documents of Illinois

Electronic Documents of Illinois

Document Identification

Users should pay particular attention to version identification or dates of publication of documents retrieved. Earlier, possibly superseded, versions of documents are also stored here.

Title

  • People v. Excavation and Lowboy Services, Inc.

Description

  • Fifth Division February 13, 2009 1-07-3345 Filed: 2-13-09 In The Appellate Court Of Illinois First Judicial District The People, ex rel. Lisa Madigan, Attorney General of the State of Illinois, and ex rel. Richard A. Devine, State's Attorney for Cook County, Illinois, Plaintiffs, v. Excavating and Lowboy Services, Inc., an Illinois Corporation, Daniel Serritella, an Individual, The City Of Harvey, an Illinois Municipal Corporation, the Harvey Park District, an Incorporated Illinois Park District, Mohammed Sayed, an Individual, and Alaadien Z. Elabady, an Individual, Defendants (The City of Harvey, Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant; The Department of Transportation, and Timothy Martin, Secretary of Transportation, Third-Party Defendants-Appellees (Achilles, Inc., Beverly Asphalt Paving Company, Dawn Companies, Inc., Dinos Cartage, Inc., Dolci Trucking, Dresden Land Improvements, Inc., Dunleavy Construction Company, H.F. Vegter Excavating Company, J.P. Hopkins Sewer Contractor, Inc., K-Five Construction Corporation, Ricci/Welch, Inc., Sid Kamp, Inc., Silvestri Paving Company, Inc., Wigboldy Excavating, Inc.Third-Party Defendants)). Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County. No. 04 CH 0863 No. 04 CH 9347 No. 07 CH 11709 (Consolidated) The Honorable Stuart E. Palmer, Judge Presiding

Originally Deposited as: 8674

Published By:
Phone Number:

Language(s): EN-English

Volume or Year:
Number or Issue:

Date Created: 02 17 2009
Date Last Modified: 02 17 2009

Librarian Remarks:

Access This Publication

1. People v. Excavation and Lowboy Services, Inc. (20090317192103_1073345.pdf).
Document Size:111284 Software: Corel PDF Engine Version: 10.990

This is part of a series. It is part of Appellate Court Opinions, First District, Fifth Division: 15749